People and access
Verify management contacts, staff roles, emergency roster, system credentials, bank permissions, keys, vendor portals, and after-hours escalation.
A transition is not complete when access changes hands. It is complete when leadership can see that critical records, responsibilities, vendors, cash controls, and communication routines are working.
The first priority is to protect life safety, cash controls, resident communication, essential service, and critical deadlines. Broader process redesign follows after the operating baseline is secure.
Every transfer should identify what was received, what remains unavailable, who is resolving each gap, and the date by which it must be verified. An undocumented handoff leaves the board responsible for assumptions it cannot prove.

Verify management contacts, staff roles, emergency roster, system credentials, bank permissions, keys, vendor portals, and after-hours escalation.
Reconcile cash, accounts payable and receivable, recurring payments, approved projects, outstanding proposals, contract dates, and immediate funding needs.
Review life-safety issues, maintenance backlog, open work orders, active claims, inspections, permits, warranties, and service interruptions.
Tell owners, residents, staff, and vendors what is changing, who to contact, which service channels remain active, and when further updates will be provided.
Document records received, missing, requested, and verified. Include an owner, date requested, dependency, and priority for every unresolved item.
Use one short dashboard for material risks, decisions needed, transition milestones, delays, and proof that critical systems are functioning.
Track receipt and verification separately. A document received during a handover is not necessarily complete, current, or usable by the new team.
These rows define suggested controls, not completed property findings. Interpret each check against your actual property records, responsible role and acceptance evidence. See the review instructions and reuse terms.
18 checks shown
No check matches those filters. Try a different term or area.
| Review area | Check | Evidence to request | Decision question |
|---|---|---|---|
| People | Authority map | Board officers manager delegates and approval limits | Who may direct urgent work? |
| People | Emergency roster | Primary and backup contacts for every critical function | Who responds after hours? |
| Access | Property access | Keys codes badges and access inventory | Can the new team reach critical spaces? |
| Access | Digital access | Systems vendors accounts and owner of each credential change | Which access remains with departed staff? |
| Access | Bank permissions | Authorized users limits and revocation confirmation | Who can move funds today? |
| Money | Cash baseline | Bank reconciliations balances restrictions and pending transfers | What balance is independently verified? |
| Money | Payables | Aged invoices recurring payments and disputed items | Which payment could interrupt service? |
| Money | Receivables | Aging collections status and unresolved owner accounts | Where is follow up required? |
| Records | Governing records | Current governing documents policies minutes and resolutions | What authority record is missing? |
| Records | Contracts | Current agreements amendments notices and renewal dates | Which contract has an urgent deadline? |
| Records | Insurance | Policies claims contacts and open requirements | What coverage question needs a specialist? |
| Operations | Critical assets | Asset list inspection dates warranties and open defects | Which system requires immediate attention? |
| Operations | Open work | Work orders projects permits and contractor commitments | What activity could be lost in handover? |
| Operations | Vendor continuity | Active vendors contacts schedules and service gaps | Which service has no confirmed provider? |
| Communication | Service channels | Resident portal phone email and after hours routing | Where should residents send requests? |
| Communication | Transition notice | Audience message date and fallback channel | Does everyone know the current contact? |
| Control | Gap log | Missing item owner request date priority and target closure | Which gap blocks a decision? |
| Control | First 90 days | Milestones service baseline reporting cadence and board review | When will stability be demonstrated? |
A file received is not necessarily a usable record.
For critical contracts, bank and portal access, keys, open claims, resident requests, vendor schedules, and statutory calendars, name both a sending and receiving owner. Test that the receiving team can locate the authoritative version, understand its status, and take the next action. Record missing or disputed items with a recovery owner and date.
The first month should include a weekly exception review: unresolved access, late invoices, service gaps, resident notices, and decisions that fell between teams. Escalate a safety or deadline issue immediately rather than waiting for the final handover report. Reconcile the transition list against the property records control guide and the monthly management report.
A fictional outgoing manager provides an export that the receiving team cannot open or reconcile. File receipt is not a usable operational handover.
Original fictional example · no completed client assignment or property inspection is represented.
| Record to obtain | Review question or calculation |
|---|---|
| Agreed inventory and format | Test opening and searching representative records |
| Export completeness check | Reconcile balances and open tasks |
| Receiving-team access and reconciliation | Retain unresolved items before outgoing access ends |
Useful working output: A handover acceptance record with tested usability and named outstanding obligations.
Open each challenge to test the reasoning against a different finding.
Check: Test representative records, attachments, dates and open balances in the receiving environment. Reconcile the source inventory to the usable copy.
Decision effect: Record the missing context and remediation owner before treating handover as complete or allowing legacy access to expire.
Check: Compare active users, administrator roles, integrations and recovery contacts against current responsibilities and the approved transition schedule.
Decision effect: Coordinate access changes with service continuity. Keep explicit ownership of every remaining privileged account.
Adapt the record request to authorized access, governing documents and the actual property. The example does not verify any unknown input or replace a professional conclusion.
Property Vendor Offboarding and Service Handover · More vendors and management selection examples
Responsibilities pass to a new management team.
Do not confuse receipt of files with operational readiness.
Have the receiving team retrieve an essential record and execute a permitted recurring workflow; retain exceptions and owners.
Original proposed coordination checks · adapt to authorized access, the actual obligation and the appropriate professional review. These are not findings about your property.
Follow the related handoff workflow · Read the review definitions
Receiving a shared-drive link does not prove that accounting history, attachments, contracts, work orders, and resident records are complete or usable. Reconcile the inventory and open representative files.
Create an acceptance owner for each record and system group. Track legacy access expiry, export deadlines, authorized signers, keys, open invoices, and ongoing resident issues without publishing credentials.
Keep a first-cycle reconciliation after cutover. Explain missing balances, recurring payments, unresolved actions, and vendor notices before declaring the transition complete.
Completion requires agreed acceptance tests for records, systems, financial balances, access, contacts, and open actions. Document exceptions and review the first reporting cycle; receipt of files alone is insufficient.
Find checklists and data definitions · Explore vendors and management selection